For B2B edible oil manufacturers, choosing between cold pressing and solvent extraction isn’t just a technical decision—it’s a strategic one that impacts yield, quality, cost, and market positioning. In this case study, we break down real-world data from two clients with different production scales to help you align your process with business goals.
According to FAO (2022), over 70% of global canola oil producers prioritize efficiency—but only 30% fully optimize for nutrient retention. This gap reveals a critical opportunity: premium health-conscious buyers are willing to pay up to 15–20% more for oils that preserve natural antioxidants like tocopherols and phytosterols—key selling points for B2B buyers targeting EU, North America, and Middle East markets.
| Feature | Cold Pressing | Solvent Extraction |
|---|---|---|
| Oil Yield (%) | 28–32% | 95–98% |
| Energy Consumption (kWh/kg) | ~1.2 kWh/kg | ~0.4 kWh/kg |
| Tocopherol Retention (%) | 85–90% | 60–70% |
| Equipment Complexity | Low-Medium | High |
Client A, a mid-sized producer in Canada, runs a 5-ton/day facility. They chose cold pressing to serve organic food brands in the U.S. Their product commands a 17% price premium due to higher omega-3 retention and clean-label appeal. Client B, a large-scale plant in Ukraine (20+ tons/day), uses solvent extraction to meet bulk demand from European food processors—where consistency and low unit cost matter most.
Both achieved strong ROI—but their success hinged on understanding which metric mattered most: profitability per batch or premium positioning per liter.
“What if your current process doesn't match your target customer profile?”
We’d love to hear your biggest challenge in choosing an extraction method. Drop a comment below—we’re reading!
.png?x-oss-process=image/resize,h_100,m_lfit/format,webp)
.png?x-oss-process=image/resize,h_100,m_lfit/format,webp)
.png?x-oss-process=image/resize,h_100,m_lfit/format,webp)
