For food manufacturers aiming to enter or expand in international markets, the age-old challenge remains: how to maximize oil yield while preserving nutritional integrity? This case study explores how one mid-sized rapeseed oil producer solved this equation—not with guesswork, but with data-driven process selection.
According to FAO (2023), over 65% of global edible oil producers cite “nutrient retention” as their top concern when choosing extraction methods—yet only 37% report achieving optimal balance between yield and quality. That’s where cold pressing and solvent extraction diverge significantly.
| Criteria | Cold Pressing | Solvent Extraction |
|---|---|---|
| Oil Yield (%) | 68–72% | 92–95% |
| Vitamin E Retention (%) | 85–90% | 55–65% |
| Energy Consumption (kWh/kg) | 3.2–4.5 | 1.8–2.5 |
| Equipment Complexity | Low-Medium | High |
| Stability (Shelf Life) | 6–12 months | 12–24 months |
In a real-world project, a European buyer requested premium-grade cold-pressed rapeseed oil for health-conscious consumers in Germany—a market where vitamin E content directly impacts product positioning. The manufacturer initially used solvent extraction due to its higher yield, but faced rejection after lab tests showed low tocopherol levels (below 150 ppm).
After switching to a hybrid approach—cold pressing for the first pass followed by gentle solvent recovery—the company achieved:
This solution wasn’t just about technology—it was about understanding the buyer’s expectations. As one procurement manager noted: “We don’t want ‘more’ oil—we want better oil.”
If you're navigating similar decisions—whether you’re producing 5 tons/day or 50—you’ll benefit from seeing the full comparison. No fluff. Just actionable insights backed by real-world outcomes.
Download our free guide: “Cold Press vs Solvent Extraction – A Complete Comparison for B2B Producers”
Get the Full PDF Guide